In grand ol’tradition, fell behind on the colloquium notices. But, here’s was the previous one, and now the next one coming up.
“Social Workers’ Attitudes Towards Recovery Among People with Serious Mental Illness”
Dr. Debra Kram-Fernandez (SUNY Empire State College)
Growing numbers of researchers have been studying mental health practitioners’ adoption of the Recovery Perspective and its operational model Psychiatric Rehabilitation. However, prior to my dissertation (2011), social workers had not been studied as a separate group. This is interesting as social workers provide the majority of services to consumers with serious mental illness in numerous capacities from direct care provision to state commissioners of mental health (Kirk, 2005). The study I will discuss examined social workers’ beliefs, practices, goals and adoption of the Recovery Perspective and Psychiatric Rehabilitation model. Participants will learn about differences between a medical perspective and a recovery perspective on serious mental illness. We will also discuss factors that might make practitioners more or less likely to subscribe to one or the other.
Kirk, S. (2005). Mental disorders in the social environment. New York: Columbia University press.
(*Note: Dr. Kram-Fernandez presented on March 1st!)
***
‘Language universals and cross-species comparisons: A multi-component approach to understand the nature of human language’
Daniel Mann (PhD Candidate in Linguistics/CUNY Brooklyn College)
Human language is a complex system that is comprised of several sub-systems (e.g., phonology, syntax, etc.) and relies on numerous domains of cognition (e.g., vocal imitation, theory of mind, etc.). However, there is considerable debate among language scientists as to whether or not there is anything that is unique to the linguistic system. That is, is there any mechanism that is both specific to language and unique to humans, and if so, what is it (Hockett 1960, Hauser et al. 2002; Fitch 2010)? The sonority sequencing principle (SSP), a putative language universal which relates to how sounds are organized with respect to each other, has been argued to be a potential candidate for uniqueness (Berent et al. 2007; Berent 2013). However, the evidence in support of this hypothesis is equivocal and certain aspects, particularly related to non-humans, remain unexplored. To address both the linguistic-specific and the species-specific issues in relation to the SSP I have taken a multi-component and interdisciplinary approach. For the former, I have gathered data from a wide range of unrelated languages and analyzed their historical development. Typological and historical research give us insight into language by offering countless “natural experiments” (Blevins 2004). The data from languages across the world suggest that the SSP is not a reflection of linguistic-specific constraints, but is epiphenomenal from non-linguistic biases in cultural acoustic transmission. For the latter question, I propose an experiment testing budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulates) on the SSP. This will be first experiment to directly test whether the SSP is based in human-specific mechanisms or is the result of broadly shared perception of physical acoustic signals.
Berent, I. (2013). The phonological mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berent, I., Steriade, D., Lennertz, T., & Vaknin, V. (2007). What we know about what we have never heard: evidence from perceptual illusions. Cognition, 104(3), 591–630.
Blevins, J. (2004). Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge University Press.
Fitch, W. T. (2010). The evolution of language. Cambridge University Press.
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve? Science, 298(5598), 1569–1579.
Hockett, Charles F. (1960) The Origin of Speech, Scientific American 203.
Date: Tuesday, March 15th, 2016
When: 4:30-5:30PM
Where: Hudson St. Gallery (325 Hudson St., NY, NY)
***
General Note: We’re proud to have this year’s events sponsored by the ESC STEM Club. Please join us after each talk for an informal Q&A with food. (I did say free food, right?)












